Discussion about this post

User's avatar
RICARDO's avatar

Hey David I enjoyed reading your essay, I love history...

You correctly outlined the historical relationship between Cyrus of Persia and the Jewish people. Cyrus the Great did indeed issue the Edict of Cyrus in 539 BCE allowing Jews to return to Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile, and the captivity ended in 538 BCE when Cyrus gave Jews permission to return to Palestine. Some of your other points I was not aware of but enjoyed reading and learning something new.

The true tragedy here is the magical thinkers. Religion has no place in a progressive, evolved, science-based society. Religion has been the cause of more deaths than any disaster or plague.

In addition, if Israel were serious about peace, they would not continue to expand into territories that were designated for the Palestinian homeland. They have become the bully on the block with the backing of the USA. The world has turned against Israel as they continue to commit genocide. History will not look kindly upon them.

One point David, ur essay was insightful, but I think u oversimplified the Hitler-Iran name change connection. The Persian government changed the name from Persia to Iran in 1935, using "the historical name of the country which had been used for centuries interchangeably though not as common as Persia. It was more about asserting national sovereignty n using Iran's indigenous name rather than being motivated by nazi ideology, a new fresh start for them n the crazy mullahs...

Expand full comment
Graham Vincent's avatar

I'd always heard that Persia is to Iran what Holland is to the Netherlands, what England is to the United Kingdom. Since Persia is the province with which most of the outside world traded, the country as whole became known as Persia to outsiders, but was always Iran to the Iranians. Whether some desire to support Germany was the reason for the edict that went out, you may like to consider why the Dutch now want their country referred to as the Netherlands, and not Holland, and why the Scots and Welsh rail at people calling their monarch the King of England. Or why the Ivory Coast would prefer us to call it the Côte d'Ivoire, or Turkey Türkiye. Are these also endeavours to align with a racial philosophy?

Expand full comment

No posts