Deconstructing “I Am Jazz”: Why Transgenderism is a Disease that Should Not be Rewarded with Genital Mutilation
by
David Gottfried
I have written several articles excoriating Trump and his simian supporters who possess miniature minds and savage hearts. Therefore, this might surprise my readers, but I am going to say something which actually is slightly supportive of one particularly fetid and feral animal in the Trump menagerie.
I am speaking of that spoiled, silly cretin, Mr. Rand Paul. Usually, I find him detestable. However, the other day, he called sex change surgeries genital mutilations, a wholly unpolitic thing to say, and I was ecstatic.
Sometimes, when the liberal conventional wisdom advises us that we should not criticize a beleaguered minority, people go overboard and endorse every extreme and grotesque idea bandied about by that minority.
I submit to you that in many cases transgenderism is a disease which should not be condoned with the violence of sex reassignment surgery. In some cases, I think it is the consequence of toxins in the environment. In other cases, I think perverse parents induce the condition.
Also, believers in male to female transgenderism have a very, very perverse conception of what womanhood is. They seem to think that a woman is simply a castrated man. A woman is a lot more than a being who lacks a penis. A woman has a uterus, and ovaries and fallopian tubes. Some people might also say that a woman has a special sort of heart, although I readily concede that such thoughts are dismissed as sentimental and absurd in our crass and mechanistic world. But the trans idea of womanhood is infinitely more absurd. I heard Bruce Caitlan Jenner say that he knew all about being a woman as he knew all about clothing and shoes. Their conception of womanhood is the conception of womanhood espoused by hysterical drag queens. Meanwhile, in the case of female to male transsexuals, it is high time we recognize that these poor souls may simply be desirous of the rights that men traditionally possess, and that does mean that they want to be men. In any event, in the cases of both male and female transgendered persons, no matter how many scarring, grotesque and psychotic surgeries sick doctors inflict. beings born xx, and beings born xy, will remain that way till the day they die.
I have watched several episodes of the reality show “I am Jazz,” a series about a rich boy, and his rich and spoiled family, who believe that Jazz is really a woman. In this series, we see him systematically emasculated by his demented family. His family consists of affluent and entirety atheistic and deracinated Jews. Hitler is probably laughing from his warren in hell.
Let me tell you why I believe that Jazz’s transgenderism is the product of his mischievous and maniacal Mother:
1) In an episode in which Jazz and her trans-girlfriends go to a prom, Jazz says that seeing Noel (one of the trans girls) in a prom dress will please Noel’s Mother and so Noel should look stunning and svelte in her gown. Noel looks miserable and embarrassed. The show pretty much admitted right there and then that transgenderism was a sickness caused by Mothers that want to de-man their sons. After all, why must Noel dress-up as a pretty girl to please his Mother.
2) When Jazz gets its driver’s license, her Mother is furious that her sex is listed as male. Jazz doesn’t seem to care. If this sexual transition, or mutilation, were Jazz’s idea, wouldn’t Jazz be upset. Why is the Mother so upset.
3) Jazz is depressed and withdrawn. Depression is often anger turned inwards. Is Jazz angry at its Mother for castrating it.
4) We are shown Film footage of Jazz saying, when she is two or three, that she has a girl’s brain in a boy’s body. This sounds scripted and staged as she uttered the most common definition and explanation of transsexualism. However, most children express thoughts in a more individual and idiosyncratic way; they only start to define things in a conventional way after they have been acculturated to the convention. Also, we would expect a toddler to express things less abstractly. So Jazz would have been more credible if she had said I have tinkerbell’s brain in a boy’s body. It appears that the Mother told Jazz to say this and then recorded it for posterity for perverse political purposes.
5) Shortly before surgery to destroy her penis, Jazz proudly talks about her last time urinating standing up. She expresses pleasure in urinating standing up, even though she purports to want to be female. The Mother is irate when Jazz expresses enjoyment about urinating standing-up. Why is the Mother so angry?
6) Jazz supposedly asked, at the age of 2, when will the good fairy change my penis into a vagina. From whom did he learn the term vagina at the age of 2. He was bright, but a high IQ doesn’t give one the ability to correctly guess nouns. Was his Mother talking to Jazz about vaginas. Why was she talking to him about vaginas ?
7) This appears to be a case of Munchausen’s syndrome by proxy. This syndrome occurs when a parent, usually a Mother, succeeds in making a child appear to have an illness and then uses the status of having a sick child as a mean to get attention. For some odd and exhibitionistic reason, the family decided that Jazz’s bodily mutilation would be witnessed by millions on television. Since the family is governed by the Mother, this decision was made, essentially, by the Mother. Just a cursory examination of the series demonstrates that the Father is a feckless weakling and that the Mother is the definitive and sole repository of power in the family.
8) Some researchers in Israel have suggested that male to female transsexuals are really individuals who are sexually aroused at the thought of being a woman. They call this condition autogynophilia. Jazz arguably is really a boy who is sexually aroused at the thought of being a woman. This proposition is buttressed by Jazz’s frequent and excitable remarks to the effect that it wants to have a very pretty vagina, by her hosting of a party denominated a “farewell to penis” party and by the febrile exhibitionism that pervades every aspect of that family’s life. I should hasten to add that claiming that a boy’s transgenderism is really autogynophilia is not the same things as contending that transgenderism is instigated by an unsound Mother, unless of course the Mother somehow fostered the boy’s autogynophilia.
9) After the surgery is conducted, it is clearly apparent that it went terribly wrong. The Mother says, on several occasions, that she is upset about this as she fears that the news of the surgery’s complications would make people less gung ho about sex reassignment surgery. Why does the Mother care so passionately about changing the sex of people ?
9) One may wonder why a Mother would want to mutilate her son, but History proves that humanity has had a recurrent predilection to wound boys and to deprive boys of their virility. I can think of three examples: A) The Castratos of the Catholic Church, or little boys who lost their testicles for the sake of the church choir, who, according to Martha Feldman in the October 8, 2015 issue of the London Review of Books, had voices which were “the audible approximation of a wailing Christ,” B) the Palace Eunuchs of feudal Courts and C) Alexander the Great’s sexual companion or lover, and I used the term lover advisedly, who had been castrated by, or upon the orders of, Alexander.
Also feminists have provided evidence which suggests that some Mothers may wish to mutilate their sons’ manhood. Feminists have been loud and clear: They are mad at men for the oppression of women. Sometimes a victim or alleged victim has no interest in equality or anything as tepid as a redress of grievances. Sometimes they want revenge. A Mother, filled with rage toward men because of male oppression, might find that the easiest and most convenient outlet for her rage is her helpless, infant son.